How Open Models Win

Nathan Lambert

Executive Director, Trillium Labs & Founder, Interconnects

Fireworks Forge 2026, November 3, 2026

Open model inference exponential growth

Open model inference exponential growth

Open model inference growth (compared to Google!)

Open model inference growth (compared to Google!)

Open models are catching up as the foundation of R&D

Qwen is mentioned in almost as many papers as OpenAI's GPT models

Open weights trail the frontier by a few months
(~3 months via Artificial Analysis)

Kimi K3.1 Pro is the 4th-best model overall
on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Open models occupy a slim slice of the price Pareto frontier

Mapping the open model economy

Building models
Moonshot · Z.ai · DeepSeek · Alibaba · Reflection · Arcee · others

Revenue growth is key to continued training-scaling, and often captured elsewhere

Building models
Moonshot · Z.ai · DeepSeek · Alibaba · Reflection · Arcee
Serve and post-train
Fireworks · Baseten · Together

Competing with integration and vast scale

Building models
Moonshot · Z.ai · DeepSeek · Alibaba · Reflection · Arcee
Serve and post-train
Fireworks · Baseten · Together
OpenAI and Anthropic own the whole stack
Products and integrations
Specialization tools
Models
Compute
Chips and data centers

The opening of an opportunity: enterprises want to own their IP and context

Building models
Moonshot · Z.ai · DeepSeek · Alibaba · Reflection · Arcee
Serve and post-train
Fireworks · Baseten · Together
Specialize and hillclimb
Prime Intellect · Applied Compute · Mercor
OpenAI and Anthropic own the whole stack
Products and integrations
Specialization tools
Models
Compute
Chips and data centers

A near-term challenge – convergence of business models

Building models
Moonshot · Z.ai · DeepSeek · Alibaba · Reflection · Arcee
Serve and post-train
Fireworks · Baseten · Together
Specialize and hillclimb
Prime Intellect · Applied Compute · Mercor
Post‑training tooling
Convergence of business models

Model builders have the resources to compete in inference

Building models
Moonshot · Z.ai · DeepSeek · Alibaba · Reflection · Arcee
↓ Pressure to move downstream
Serving tokens
Fireworks · Baseten · Together
Specialize and hillclimb
Prime Intellect · Applied Compute · Mercor
Post‑training tooling
Convergence of business models

Open models are economically fragmented

Building models
Moonshot · Z.ai · DeepSeek · Alibaba · Reflection · Arcee
Serve and post-train
Fireworks · Baseten · Together
Specialize and hillclimb
Prime Intellect · Applied Compute · Mercor
OpenAI and Anthropic own the whole stack
Products and integrations
Specialization tools
Models
Compute
Chips and data centers

The rising costs of training a truly frontier model are looming
Labs will start getting pushed out

Is the value in open models fully resting on keeping up?

The task for open models – build the cheapest, most adaptable, private intelligence

GLM 5.2 was a step change for open agents

  • Used by researchers across industry to complement Claude/Codex
  • Finetunable to specialized workflows
  • The first open model to have agentic product-market-fit like Opus 4.5 in December 2025

Win condition 1: Driving the cost of proven LLM workflows to 0

Win condition 1: Driving the cost of proven LLM workflows to 0

Detour / Challenge: Astronomical demand for compute is maintaining high margins across open & closed model providers.

Win condition 1: Driving the cost of proven LLM workflows to 0

Detour / Challenge: Astronomical demand for compute is maintaining high margins across open & closed model providers.

Open models will only win when we’re willing to drive prices down to commodity pricing, slightly above the price of compute, or even below to gain market share.

Win condition 2: Adaptable, private, controlled intelligence

Win condition 2: Adaptable, private, controlled intelligence

Frontier labs are not going to be willing to deploy their models on-premise for companies who want to control their internal expertise, data, and IP in the face of super-powerful AI.

Win condition 2: Adaptable, private, controlled intelligence

Frontier labs are not going to be willing to deploy their models on-premise for companies who want to control their internal expertise, data, and IP in the face of super-powerful AI.

Open models are the only viable path for companies that want to build their own agents and deep AI ownership.

An economic engine for ownership and cost-saving

Harvey Tenet Research Preview

Harvey, August 2026: a Kimi K3 base post-trained with Fireworks for legal work, so law firms can own their models

Mercor: Training frontier knowledge work agents

Mercor and SkyRL, September 2026: Qwen3.5-397B-A17B post-trained on expert data, with the script and weights released

Example: Harvey post-trains Kimi K3 for legal work

Harvey Tenet Research Preview

Harvey, August 2026: a Kimi K3 base post-trained with Fireworks for legal work, so law firms can own their models

Harvey Tenet on the quality-cost Pareto frontier of Legal Agent Bench hold-out tasks

Harvey, August 2026: quality-cost frontier on Legal Agent Bench hold-out tasks; Tenet nearly doubles the all-pass rate of its Kimi K3 base at a stable cost

Open models will thrive as compute becomes less abundant

Win condition 1: Driving the cost of proven LLM workflows to 0

Win condition 2: Adaptable, private, controlled intelligence

Let’s build the open future together

interconnects.ai – Open model analysis & ecosystem research

Trillium Labs – fostering the open science of open post-training

nathan@natolambert.com